Desenvolvimento de Ceraeochrysa cincta (Schneider, 1851) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) alimentada com dieta artificial na fase larval

Hermann Moller; Érica A. Taguti; Luis C. S. Amorim; Matheus M. D. Pinto; Sergio A. De Bortoli

doi:10.37486/2675-1305.ec02027

Authors

Hermann Moller Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”, UNESP, Laboratório de Ecologia Aplicada https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4658-9039
Érica A. Taguti 2Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”, UNESP, Laboratório de Biossistemática de Hemiptera https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8785-9525
Luis C. S. Amorim Ourofino Agrociência https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3616-8134
Matheus M. D. Pinto Universidade Estadual Paulista "Júlio de Mesquita Filho" - UNESP/FCAV
Sergio A. De Bortoli 4Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”, UNESP, Laboratório de Biologia e Criação de Insetos https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0957-6164

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37486/2675-1305.ec02027

Keywords:

biological control, rearing, biology

Abstract

Abstract. Mass production of lacewings is still a bottleneck for applied biological control and for biofactories producing natural enemies, due to the difficulties of large-scale production and the cost of the undertaking and the production of their alternative prey. Thus, the objective of this work was to evaluate the viability of an alternative artificial diet to rearing of Ceraeochrysa cincta (Schneider, 1851) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Three treatments were analyzed for this purpose, consisting of: 1) natural diet - eggs of Corcyra cephalonica (Stainton, 1866) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), 2) artificial diet honey + beer yeast (1:1) and 3) natural diet (1) + artificial diet (2), and were offered to the larval stage of the predator. The biological parameters of C. cincta evaluated where: duration of larval, pupal and adult phases; pupal weight; pupal viability; sex ratio; pre-oviposition and oviposition periods and number of eggs per female. Were obtained adults only in the treatments 1 and 3 and, in the treatment 2 no insect reached the pupal stage. The results obtained demonstrated that the artificial diet, when offered in isolation, causes significant differences in the duration of the larval period, especially in the 3rd instar, and in the weight of the pupae, with the other similar parameters in the treatments, but can serve as a nutritional supplement.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Auad, A. M.; Toscano, L. C.; Boiça Júnior, A. L.; Freitas, S. (2001) Aspectos biológicos dos estádios imaturos de Chrysoperla externa (Hagen) e Ceraeochrysa cincta (Schneider) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) alimentados com ovos e ninfas de Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) Biótipo B (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). Neotropical Entomology, 30(3): 429-432. doi: 10.1590/S1519-566X2001000300015

Barbosa, P.; Wratten, S. D. (1998) Influence of plants on invertebrate predators: implications to conservation biological control. In: Barbosa, P. (Ed.) Conservation biological control. pp.83-100. Academic Press.

Canard, M.; Principi, M. M. (1984) Feeding habits. In: Canard, M.; Seméria, Y.; New T. R. (Eds.) Biology of Chrysopidae. pp.27-76. Springer Netherlands.

Carvalho, C. F.; Souza, B. (2009) Métodos de criação e produção de crisopídeos. In: Bueno, V. H. P. (Eds.). Controle biológico de pragas: produção massal e controle de qualidade. pp.91-92. Lavras: UFLA.

Chapman, J. W.; Reynolds, D. R.; Smith, A. D.; Riley, J. R.; Pedgley, D. E.; Woiwod, I. P. (2002) High altitude migration of the diamondback moth Plutella xylostella to the UK: a study using radar, aerial netting, and ground trapping. Ecological Entomology, 27(6): 641-650. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2311.2002.00472.x

Coll, M.; Guershon, M. (2002) Omnivory in terrestrial arthropods: mixing plant and prey diets. Annual review of entomology, 47(1): 267-297. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.47.091201.145209

De Bortoli, S. A.; Murata, A. T.; Brito, C. H.; Narciso, R. S. (2009) Aspectos biológicos de Ceraeochrysa cincta (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae), em condições de laboratório. Revista de Biologia e Ciência da Terra, 9(2): 101-106.

De Bortoli, S. A.; Murata, A. T. (2011) Morphometrical aspects of Ceraeochrysa paraguaria (Navás, 1920) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) feeding on different preys. Comunicata Scientiae, 2(2): 122-125. doi: 10.14295/cs.v2i2.19

Figueira, L. K.; Carvalho, C. F.; Souza, B. (2002) Influência da temperatura sobre alguns aspectos biológicos de Chrysoperla externa (Hagen, 1861) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) alimentada com ovos de Alabama argillacea (Hübner, 1818) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Ciência e Agrotecnologia, 26: 1439-1450.

Freitas, S. (2001) Criação de crisopídeos (Bicho-lixeiro) em laboratório. Jaboticabal: Funep.

Freitas, S.; Penny, N. D. (2001) The green lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) of Brazilian agro-ecossystems. Proceedings of the California Academy of Science, 52: 245-395.

Freitas, S.; Penny, N. D.; Adams, P. A. (2009) A revision of the New world genus Ceraeochrysa (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences, 60(15): 503.

Janssen, A.; Sabelis, M. W. (2015) Alternative food and biological control by generalist predatory mites: the case of Amblyseius swirski. Experimental and Applied Acarology, 65: 413-418. doi: 10.1007/s10493-015-9901-8

Limburg, D. D.; Rosenheim, J. A. (2001) Extrafloral nectar consumption and its influence on survival and development of an omnivorous predator, larval Chrysoperla plorabunda (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Environmental Entomology, 30(3): 595-604. doi: 10.1603/0046-225X-30.3.595

Martins, C. C.; Machado, R. J. P. (2020) Chrysopidae. In: Catálogo Taxonômico da Fauna do Brasil. http://fauna.jbrj.gov.br/fauna/faunadobrasil/96. Access on: 15.ii.2020.

McEwen, P. K.; Jervis, M. A.; Kidd, N. A. C. (1993) Influence of artificial honeydew on larval development and survival in Chrysoperla carnea [Neur., Chrysopidae]. Entomophaga, 38(2): 241-244. doi: 10.1007/BF02372559

New, T. R. (1975) The biology of Chrysopidae and Hemerobiidae (Neuroptera), with reference to their usage as biocontrol agents: a review. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London. 127: 115-140. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2311.1975.tb00561.x

Nuñez, E. (1988) Ciclo biológico y crianza de Chrysoperla externa y Ceraeochrysa cincta (Neuroptera, Chrysopidae). Revista Peruana de Entomología, 31: 76-82.

Oliveira, R.; de Oliveira Barbosa, V.; Vieira, D. L.; De Oliveira, F. Q.; de Luna Batista, J.; De Brito, C. H. (2016) Development and reproduction of Ceraeochrysa cubana (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) fed with Aleurocanthus woglumi (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae). Semina: Ciências Agrárias, 37(1): 17-23.

Pessoa, L. G. A.; Freitas, S.; Loureiro, E. S. (2010) Adequação de dietas para criação de adultos de Chrysoperla externa (Hagen) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Arquivos do Instituto Biológico, 77(4): 723-725.

Pessoa, L. G. A. (2009) Efeito da variação da temperatura sobre o desenvolvimento embrionário e pós-embrionário de Chrysoperla raimundoi Freitas & Penny (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Arquivos do Instituto Biológico, 76: 239-244.

SAS Institute Inc. (2015) SAS/IML® 14.1vUser’s Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc. https://www.sas.com/pt_br/home.html.

Sosa, F.; Freitas, S. (2010) New Neotropical species of Ceraeochrysa Adams (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Zootaxa, 2562(1): 57-65. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.2562.1.4

Van Rijn, P. C.; Van Houten, Y. M.; Sabelis, M. W. (2002) How plants benefit from providing food to predators even when it is also edible to herbivores. Ecology, 83(10): 2664-2679. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[2664:HPBFPF]2.0.CO;2